college of engineering white

Project 6: Walker


The goal of this project is to design and assemble a walker for a child having issues with mobility and supporting themself. The walker will grant the child a chance to walk easier as well as build core strength and promote abdominal muscle growth.

Alex Barker, Hunter Justice, Cole LeSar, Jordan Frerichs

Problem Statement

The child we have been assigned has a condition that prevents her from being able to support herself upright or walk in a proper manner. Our team has been tasked to design or improve upon a walker that will better suit the specific needs of the child. Upon meeting the family, they addressed her dislike of her current walker and some of the faults that cause issues with her day-to-day use.

A major issue the family faces is their current walker relies on a type of abdomen securing apparatus which makes the child uncomfortable and essentially holds her up. The family wishes for a design that does not have a means for securing the child in and promotes muscle growth and posture improvement. We have also been tasked with providing a way for the walker to be possibly motorized and implement better-designed armrests so as she practices walking she can take breaks when she becomes tired.

Design Specifications

  • lightweight 
  • Motorized 
  • Armrests 
  • Compact 
  • Locking- wheels 
  • Adjustable armrests 
  • No abdominal support apparatus 

Background Research

As we tried to work on some ideas for the walker, we reflected on several youth-sized walkers currently being produced. Meeting with the family of the child provided us with insight into the current walker they are using as well as why they dislike it. 

From the research we conducted, we were able to come up with some conceptual ideas that would best fit the needs of the child.

Concept Design 1

The first concept we created revolves around the idea of designing a walker with forward-moving caster-style wheels in the front and swivel casters on the back. This design would allow for a more controlled turn of the walker. The family mentioned their discontent with how all of their current walker’s wheels are able to swivel 360°. This results in a harder turn for the child as she walks through obstacles such as hallways and door frames. 


The family also made sure to express the issue of the weight of the walker. This walker design would utilize an aluminum frame to allow more ease for a small child to move the walker on their own without the help of a parent.

Concept Design 2

Our second design involves the possibility of making a walker which could be motorized. The goal of the motor being implemented is not to let the child become reliant on it, but to use it as a backup for difficult terrain or help when they become tired from walking.


 The motor will be controlled by the front handles located next to the armrests. This walker utilizes a front-wheel drive concept with motorized caster-style wheels in the front and swivel castor wheels on the back. The handles for operating the motorized wheels will be located next to the armrests for ease of access. 


This walker revolves around a more traditional style of walker more commonly seen.

Concept Design 3

The third design focuses on portability, mobility, and adjustability. Similar to design 2 it integrates the locked motorized front wheels and also free-rotating back wheels. The battery and motor box can be removed if necessary. The forearm rests are designed to move forward and backward and rotate in and out. This allows adjustability as she grow. The links are also adjustable to account for change in her height over time. Aluminum will be the main material because it will help reduce overall weight.

It is designed to be able to be taken apart with relative ease. The battery box, forearm rests, and support links can be removed by lifting the supports out (adjustable support can be unlocked and lifted up). Making the chassis fold down would also be something worth incorporating.

Selected Concept Design

After considering the concepts above, we decided to select Concept 3 because of the higher score it received on the decision matrix.

Decision Matrix

Overview of Selected Design

After considering and evaluating the specific requests of the family, we as a group decided to build upon a walker that was found through research completed after the preliminary design stage.

The Drive Medical KA1200-2GWp Nimbo Posterior Walker is the walker we selected. This specific type of walker comes in sizes ranging from extra small to large. After receiving the child’s size parameters from the parents, we found that a small-size walker of this type would be the best fit for her.  The walker possesses the following traits:

  • Aluminum alloy frame
    • Lightweight (12.8 lbs)
  • Collapsable frame for transportation
  • Adjustable height
  • Modifiable
  • Higher maximum weight capacity (85lbs)

Under further review, it was a collective decision to cancel the idea of the motorized possibility for the walker. After consulting with the family of Avonlea, they agreed that the main priority of the walker is to be a learning tool for her to gain the ability to walk. We felt the motor would provide a chance for her to become too dependent on the motorized option. The weight of the motor and power source would also inhibit the chances of her being able to push the walker more easily.

Describe Design Details

The following modifications will be made to the walker:

  • Attaching adjustable forearm rests for the comfort of the child
  • Implementing handles on the frame to increase the ease of turning the walker around obstacles
  • Applying a cross-bar support across the handles of the frame for the armrests

Engineering Analysis 1

Due to the drastic change in the weight of this walker compared to Avonlea’s current walker, we decided to compute the force required to accelerate the walker. For this we assumed the following:

  • Avg. walking speed = 1-1.25 mph
  • Friction force of an applicable surface she would encounter
  • Maximum walker weight (after added modifications) = 20lbs

This yielded that She would need to exert a force of approximately 2.52-2.88 lbf for her to move the walker.

Bill of Materials


2023 Spring